Sasquatch Genome Study: DNA Profile Unveiled Amidst Controversy and NDAs

Title: A Deep Dive into the Sasquatch DNA Study: NDAs and Naysayers Hey there, Squatchable readers! We've got another intriguing episode for you today, this time from the YouTube channel Scott Carpenter | Sasquatch Awareness Project. In this video, we delve into Chapter 6 of The Sasquatch DNA Study, focusing on Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) and the skeptics. The study, as it progressed, revealed some shocking findings - the Sasquatch was a human hybrid. The group, realizing the gravity of this discovery, found themselves questioning the conventional scientific theory that the Sasquatch phenomenon was a hoax. Three nuclear DNA single gene sequences were sequenced by Ketchum, all within the human ranges but none of which existed in Ginbank. This left the group puzzled, as six out of the six sequences were not present in Jinbank. The study consisted of several independent groups, each with their own non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to ensure confidentiality. Critics often accused the group of being in it for fame or money, but this was a self-funded effort. The group, however, was disappointed to find that neither the scientific community nor the Bigfoot research community would be supportive or objective in their evaluation of the study. Leaks to the press from research team members like Richard Substad, Bob Smallsbach, and Derek Randles caused irreparable damage to the study. Substad, upon leaving the study, began leaks to blogger Robert Lindsay, providing him with misinformation for the next two years. Lindsay's posts, in turn, were cited by other blogs, leading to a constant stream of rumors and misinformation. Substad's actions, while intended to inform the public, did significant harm to the study. His opinion of Dr. Ketchum also led to vicious personal attacks and unsubstantiated rumors that Dr. Ketchum was only in it for the money. The study's confidentiality was crucial, as a nationally or internationally known journal would not accept a paper for review if there were detailed information concerning the study in the public domain. This is why making public detailed information concerning the findings of the study were so damaging. As Bigfoot believers, we understand the importance of confidentiality in scientific studies, especially those concerning such a controversial subject. We encourage our readers to watch the video for a more comprehensive understanding of the Sasquatch DNA Study and the challenges it faced. Stay tuned for more exciting Bigfoot-related content here at Squatchable!